Article written by Adam Pieniazek

11 responses to “3rd Party Debate: Bob Barr vs. Ralph Nader vs. Ron Paul vs. Dennis Kucinich vs. Green Party’s Candidate”

  1. Matt

    Make sure to check out:
    http://www.campaignforliberty.com/

    Personally, I’m a Ron Paul nut. He’s got tons of experience and is incredibly intelligent. He stands on his morals and I think he would be the best candidate out of that group. That being said, they need to work together and not against each other. If ever there is progress to be made, they have to band together.

  2. Adam Pieniazek

    Ron Paul is great though he too has some flaws, no one candidate is perfect. The great part about Mr. Paul is if he truly allows a return to state’s rights would allow the local community to grow and America would become more unique and diverse.

    I’d love to see a Paul-Kucinich ticket emerge to help build up good social programs (free public health care and free good education). I’m still not sure who I’ll vote for, just that I won’t vote for McCain or Obama.

  3. Pat Rogers

    Alan Keyes would win. But even YOU didn’t think to invite him to the hypothetical party.

  4. Adam Pieniazek

    Good point Pat. I actually did consider adding Keyes and the other candidates wikipedia listed but a debate can quickly turn into a free for all that has too many debaters and not enough time spend focusing on issues.

    Perhaps a tournament debate system can be created to pick out the 4-6 best 3rd party and independent candidates and then have a final debate among those 4-6 candidates?

  5. Entreview.com

    3rd Party Debate: Bob Barr vs. Ralph Nader vs. Ron Paul vs. Dennis Kucinich vs. Green Party’s Candidate | Adam Pieniaze…

    Would you watch a debate between the top 3rd party candidates?…

  6. jay

    Alan Keyes. LMAO, wasn’t he last seen in Borat? Keyes is a terrible joke and a caricature of himself 20 years ago.

  7. Adam Pieniazek

    Yeah, I suppose you’re right Jay. When you really look at it, all the candidates are somewhat of a joke. First off, one person simply will not have that much of an effect on the nation. Anyone even slightly versed in leadership theory knows that it takes a group to affect real change. Second, who do these people think they are being all high and mighty thinking they’re better than us? Third, the congressional elections are way, way more important, the presidential elections are just glorified popularity contests nowadays.

  8. Welcome Frye

    Ralph Nader and Chuck Baldwin had a debate recently, and it was everything that the Obama/McCain debates should have been!

    No jabs at each other, and all they talked about was the issues.

    Nader ’08!

  9. Matt

    Do you have video of that debate??

  10. Adam Pieniazek

    I agree Frye, the Nader-Baldwin debates were great and discussed issues not petty points. At this point though I’m fairly convinced the mainstream debates are the way they are to emulate two fighters taking jabs at each other without either one delivering the knockout punch. It helps both parties to ensure that both parties are above any third party.

    Matt, I don’t have a video of it but did live blog the debate over at Proletariat Power. Also, if you do a search at cspan.com for Nader the debate video is listed, but it’s in real player format…

  11. Micheal Jackson

    I think mickey Mouse should be president!!