Still, I must admit that at least some of these schools imbibed some educational material in me, some more than others. I’ll be the first to admit that some of the best learning moments of my life happened outside the classroom, whether it was walking around the City of Boston while (rarely) skipping class at the Boston Latin School or just hanging out in my dorm at the U. of Southern California and meeting all kinds of random and diverse people from all over the world, to driving through little country towns in North Carolina during my time at Chapel Hill, I realized life is too hectic to spend in a classroom. If you don’t get out there and start living it doesn’t matter how many degrees you stack up!

So, without further ramblings and justifications from this well traversed mind, here are the top five best schools I’ve attended, judged from an educational standpoint.

5. Northeastern University
4. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
3. University of Massachusetts at Amherst
2. University of Southern California
1. Boston Latin School

Now, I can see how that list might be surprising to some, but I assure you 80-90% of the BLS alumni reading this list are nodding their heads, going yup.

Sumus primi.

As I discussed last week, I feel there is variability in these types of assessments and if I re-took the assessment a week, a month [etc.] from now, I would score differently. Nevertheless, at this point in time the results are clear, I value people, enjoy pleasing them, and value loyalty among coworkers. From knowing myself better than anyone else, I’d have to agree with the values a high LPC score denotes. However, my competitive side also values completing a task and desires competence in my coworkers. Looking at my satisfaction with types of work I’ve done over the past one and a half years [at State Street], I know I prefer long-term projects over repetitive short-term tasks. In fact, a few months ago I moved over to a processing team, where the tasks are similar, day in and day out, and the volume is high. Although I derived pleasure from finishing a high volume of these tasks, I found myself making mistakes as the tasks require an attention to very minute details. Part of these tasks involves applying tax rates to a client depending on their residency, account structure and other details. I found I would constantly apply the wrong tax rate [luckily, our auditors caught all of these before they went live] or make a small typo. Overall, my quality of work on this task-processing team was good but not exceptional.

Meanwhile, I was working on multiple projects before joining the task processing team, and earned an Outstanding Performance award for my devotion to the project’s goals. On these projects, I would have to build a good working relationship with coworkers in the office and in outside organizations. I excelled at building these relationships, which allowed me to push my coworkers and contacts when necessary without damaging the relationship. I also paid more attention to the details of the project, and made fewer mistakes as I had a commitment to my coworkers and contacts to ensure quality work. Also, the details in the projects were of a much more complex nature and dealt with client and market situations, rather than minute details.

So even though I fight the results of these assessments, it does seem, compared to my actual experiences, that I am a high LPC, at least more than I am a low LPC. Rather than being heavily tilted to one side, I feel that I use aspects of both, depending on the situation and my mood, to accomplish my and the organization’s goals. It also does not surprise me that my LPC shows I am motivated by relationships right now. I work in the typical corporate office setting, where networking plays a much larger role in promotions than performance.

There is a leadership situation in my past, which goes counter to my current LPC score. In this situation, I was the formal and informal leader! A brief background, in the 6th grade, I gained admission into the prestigious Boston Latin School, a public exam school [you must pass a test to enter the school], for the 7th grade. In the 8th grade, I tried out for and made the freshman football team. Although there were tryouts, in essence everyone was able to play for the team who had a modicum of desire or bare minimum of skills. At Latin, our athletic teams are not the focus of the school, and are quite often the last area to receive funding. We still do not have a home football field and instead share White Stadium with the other city schools. The lack of funding and focus on academics has negatively affected the football’s teams performance. The freshman team had a longstanding tradition of winless seasons, a tradition which repeated in my first year on the team. In the 9th grade, I was appointed to one of the two co-captain positions for the freshman team.

Accepting my responsibility as a captain, I was extremely motivated to win at least one game. That was my goal, and I viewed each game as a task with a clear success/failure evaluation. If we won, we succeeded; if we lost, we failed.

Self-Rating of Effectiveness

Score: 5/10

Although the freshmen team did not win a single game under my captaincy, I still feel the group and I had a few moral victories. For one, right from the start we were behind all of our competitors. Rather than playing against other public high schools in the city of Boston, we played in the Dual County League, playing teams from rich suburban neighborhoods, with a lot more resources and focus on their athletic success. Many of the kids on these suburban teams had been playing together since their early youth, so they not only had more experience playing football, but also more experience playing together. There were more than a few games where we were simply blown out.

Another disadvantage which directly affected our group performance was our lack of a home field. Whereas the varsity team played at White Stadium, a shared home stadium among city teams, the freshman team traveled to our competitor’s field for all of our games. Not only did we not have a home field crowd to motivate us, we also experienced biased referees who would clearly make calls to help the home team. If we could have played all of our games under unbiased referees, we definitely would have won at least a couple of games. Even though we failed my goal of winning one game, under the circumstances we performed admirably.

Leader-Member Relations

Score: 19/40

The fact that this was a high school football team helped and hurt leader-member relations. For one, we were all less mature then, and petty differences between people would cause fights between individuals occasionally. I didn’t help matters much either, as I led by a decidedly authoritative style, often yelling at my teammates after we lost games. In particular, a lot of my teammates didn’t seem to care as much about the end result of the game as I did; conversely, I cared too much about the end result in the grand scheme of life. I really wanted our team to break the winless tradition and my teammates understood that no one would blame us for not winning a game. Neither side was right, and a healthy medium existed which would have benefited everyone if both sides drifted more to that healthy middle ground. Hence, even though I led with a strong right hand, I also was friends with many of these people on and off the field, which helped me avoid physical harm from my leadership style. My friends and teammates understood I just wanted us to win, but then and now they think I would have been more effective if I relaxed my style a bit. The other co-captain led more by example and less by actual leadership. He was calm and stayed back often, but at times would also yell and shout at our teammates; the difference is when he yelled our teammates knew he was dead serious and it was time to shape up immediately. He still should have been more vocal, and several of our friend-teammates encouraged him to talk more often. We all had our faults back then, hind-sight is great now but at the time we tried our best and still often failed miserably.

Task Structure

Task Structure Part I: 16/20
Task Structure Part II: (-) 3/9
Task Structure: 13

Any sports team has to be structured to ensure all of the players and coaches are on the same page, hence why every sports team has a playbook. The playbook is the blue-print of the team’s strategy. Plus, the goal is obviously clear, win. The team’s schedule also has to be structured to ensure everyone is at the same place at the same time. If the timing of the players is off, the play usually won’t work and might even result in penalties. On a successful team, everyone knows their role and understands the step they need to take to fulfill that role. In this way, our team was like the majority of teams. Timing and adaptability were the two big shortcomings of our structure. As I said before, we were at a disadvantage since all the other teams had years of experience of playing with each other, and had all of their plays and timing and style down quite well. They were also able to adapt plays to the talents of their players, since the coaches had plenty of time to evaluate their players and adjust their strategy accordingly. On the other hand, our team’s coaches barely had enough time to implement our playbook, yet alone start changing it to fit the unique skills of our players.

I had one year of formal experience and training over the rest of my teammates, so I chose a moderate level of training and experience. I didn’t choose very little because our academic program was much better than any of the other schools and trained me to critically analyze situations, which comes in handy on a football field, where you have to quickly analyze and act on a huge number of factors during every play. My obsession with football also helped analyze game film and adjust my game accordingly.

Position Power

Score: 6/0

As a co-captain I had some power over my teammates, but the coach is the dictator in this situation, and at best I could only offer recommendations on players and strategies.

Did my leadership style fit the situation? At the time, no, if I was in the same situation now, yes. At the time I was much closer to an a low LPC than my current high LPC. A low LPC thrives in situations with high or low control, whereas the co-captain of a high school football team has moderate to low control over the situation, requiring a high LPC for success. My co-captain was closer to a high LPC at the time, but he too struggled with the low control portion of the situation, whereas I was a low LPC at the time, and struggled with the moderate control of the situation.

The results of my low LPC style in this moderate control situation match the predictions of Fiedler’s Contingency Theory on the surface. Below the surface, we had a few moral victories which just do not show up in quantitative analysis of the situation. The next year, our junior varsity team, earned a 4-6 record, and still all of us objectively agreed we should have been 6-4, if a very few factors were flipped. Of course, the opposite is also true and we could have also ended up with only 1-2 wins too. The junior varsity team kept the same two captains from our freshman year and added two additional captains. I also matured greatly and focused much more on relationships, for instance making sure my teammates didn’t play hurt and that everyone got a chance to attempt a position they wanted to play. I also had a lot more input with the coach on how our team should be managed. Although I was still focused on tasks, the fact that we were succeeding at these tasks took the edge of my authoritative style and I gradually moved to the middle of the LPC scale, where expecting competence and loyalty from my teammates greatly improved my leadership effectiveness.

If I knew what I know now, about football and leadership, I am quite confident that if placed in the same position, I could share enough knowledge and help my teammates by leading them on the path to (at least one) victory.

Here’s the squirrel just chilling while it observes what I’m doing:

As it realizes I’m not a threat, it goes on it’s way, doing whatever a spider squirrel does, which apparently means running on this ledge in a death-defying manner:

I love how 80-90% of its body, including its head, is below the ledge as it scampers about! BTW, the squirrel did make it safely around the pillar and back, fully, onto the ledge.

Spider squirrel, spider squirrel, does whatever a spider squirrel does!

Being relatively smoke-free for more than six months now I’m here to tell you about the immense benefits of not smoking and how to quit smoking in less than one minute. There’s simply too much material to cover in one post so we’ll have a 3-4 part series about cigarettes, their dangers and how to quit. Today let’s go through some of my personal history. Next we’ll talk about the pros and cons of smoking, focusing on health, economics, and time. Finally, we’ll discuss how to quit smoking in less than one minute. If you’re not subscribed to the RSS feed, now would be a good time to subscribe!

For the first 18 years of my life I never smoked a cigarette and was very adamant about the dangers of smoking and trying to get people around me to quit. When I was a little kid there was one or two incidents where I threw a cup of water at my step-father while he was smoking. Needless to say I quickly figured out this was not a very good strategy! I’d also see my mom smoking on very rare occasions and would take the cigarette from her and threaten that I’d start smoking it if she didn’t put it out. So, you can see I was certainly not a smoker, knew the dangers and publicly promoted not smoking.

Alas, a few months into my freshman semester at the University of Southern California, I got a little too drunk and ended up smoking a cigarette and enjoying it. Though I smoked on only very rare occasions for a few months, eventually I degraded to being a pack a day smoker. The low point came that summer, while working for my step-dad as a construction worker, I smoked nearly two packs a day!

The next school year, I incidentally transferred to the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, home of Tobacco Road. Though I didn’t repeat the mistakes of smoking two packs a day I still smoked way too much. Even as a poor college student, I could easily find ways to scrounge up the $2-$2.25 for a pack of smokes. Yup, they are dirt-cheap there as much of America’s tobacco is grown in the region.

So my drunken slip turned into a habit and six years later at the age of 24 I was still smoking nearly a pack a day. At this point though my desire to quit was growing exponentially every day. A few incidents pushed me past the tipping point. In January of this year I quit smoking cold turkey. I had one relapse, which I expected to happen, but it only served to further convince me that not smoking is clearly the right move. Seven months into my smoke-free existence and I’m wicked happy and healthy. Buying and riding a bicycle personally helped me remember to keep my lungs clear and over the course of this series we’ll discuss similar strategies for kicking the habit and staying clean. Remember to sign up for the RSS feed or e-mail updates to stay up to date.

Bill Drayton is one such individual; his attention to micro situations such as the “bubble”¹, an air zone that allows us to associate pollution to a polluter, and searching for individuals, “…who will become references in their field, who will set or change patterns at the national level or, in the case of a small country, at a larger regional level²“, led to macro-level improvements in environmental standards and growth of social entrepreneurship.

Through a majority of his professional career, Bill has shown a passion for innovative ways to infuse ethical values ["the language used by Drayton...is caring, compassionate and moral"³], and positive change into society.

At a time when socialism has been proven to be a dismal failure, and government programs have created as many problems as they solve, Ashoka may well be showing us the path to a better world.⁴

At the Environmental Protection Agency, Mr. Drayton championed a trading system for environmental credits, which companies could buy to offset their negative impact on the environment, or sell for profit, if they produced in an environmentally friendly manner. Bill recognized that financial incentives are a crucial motivating factor for American business and that combining economics and environmentalism would lead to fruitful results for companies, government, and society as a whole. At the time, his idea was unpopular among environmental groups

‘Concepts that Bill was advocating twenty years ago, that were considered radical cave-ins by the environmental movement, are today advocated by nearly everybody as better ways to control pollution’ explains Jodie Bernstein, the director of the Bureau of Consumer Protection, who worked with Drayton at the EPA.²

By the late 1990s, emissions trading had drastically reduced sulfur dioxide pollution and was implemented in the European Union’s strategy for complying with the Kyoto Protocol.¹ This visionary ability of Drayton’s would carry over to Ashoka, where he worked to empower social entrepreneurs to affect change in their communities by first changing the perception of non-profit organizations, from purely looking at organizations to searching out individuals. To do so, Drayton first instilled other social entrepreneurs into Ashoka, to increase the efficiency of finding new socially driven individuals.

Every aspect of Ashoka exudes change, from the transformations in society that allowed for the birth of Ashoka, to the mission of Ashoka of empowering social entrepreneurs to enact improvements within their communities, Ashoka is in the business of change.

Drayton sees Ashoka’s success as coming at a critical time. ‘The last two decades have seen the emergence of a competitive citizen sector,’ he says, ‘a rapid multiplication of the number, size, and skill level of citizen organizations. It’s as important as the emergence of the competitive business sector many centuries ago.’⁵

We especially see this emphasis on change instilled into Ashoka’s vision and mission.

Vision:

Ashoka envisions a world where Everyone is a Changemaker: a world that responds quickly and effectively to social challenges, and where each individual has the freedom, confidence and societal support to address any social problem and drive change.

Mission:

Ashoka strives to shape a global, entrepreneurial, competitive citizen sector: one that allows social entrepreneurs to thrive and enables the world’s citizens to think and act as changemakers. ⁶

It comes as no surprise then, that Bill Drayton heavily utilizes change-oriented leadership to accomplish his and Ashoka’s goals. When describing Drayton, Michael Northrop and Julien Phillips are amazed at Bill’s “…unshakable faith in what’s he’s doing and in the value of each person’s life toward effecting change…That’s a tremendously powerful combination.”⁷

Michael and Julien, an Ashoka employee and an Ashoka founding director (respectively) witness the supreme self-confidence and concrete belief Dayton places in himself and his ideas, a telling sign of charismatic leadership. Northrop felt that Dayton’s charismatic leadership made it seem he had a whole army of supporters, when in reality he only had a few individuals, and that the sheer force of his belief in his ideas seemed to lend them a quality of inevitability.¹ In addition to this super self-confidence and conviction in his ideas, Bill displays the other characteristics of charismatic leaders, defined by Afsaneh Nahavandi as high energy and enthusiasm, expressiveness and excellent communication skills, active image building and role modeling.⁸

In an interview with U.S. News & World Report, Bill shows us his high energy and enthusiasm for social entrepreneurship while answering a question about difficult times at Ashoka, How could any entrepreneur, confronted by such amazing opportunities to help transform the world and to do so with such extraordinary colleagues, be tempted to lose focus?⁹ Mr. Drayton clearly loves his line of work and is able to utilize his full energy and utmost enthusiasm to distribute the Ashoka vision and mission because of his belief in the virtues of Ashoka and the satisfaction he gets from working to distribute the Ashoka vision.

Muhammud Yunus and Bill Drayton [left to right]:

Role modeling is also very evident at Ashoka and in Bill’s leadership style:

When Drayton calls someone a ‘social entrepreneur,’ he is describing a specific and rare personality type–someone, in fact, like himself…Ashoka’s social entrepreneur is a pathbreaker with a powerful new idea, who combines visionary and real-world problem-solving creativity, who has a strong ethical fiber, and who is ‘totally possessed’ by his or her vision for change.²

These are characteristics evident within Bill Drayton, and characteristics which Ashoka seeks to find in other social entrepreneurs, after all Bill Drayton is, as David Bornstein describes in an interview with David Creelman of HR.com…the social entrepreneur of social entrepreneurship.¹⁰ Bill saw a gap between the commercial and social sector and realized social entrepreneurs could bridge that gap. Before anyone heard of micro-finance or sustainable investments, Drayton acted to aid individuals in solving social issues through good business logic and sense.

Traveling around the world he began to see that the most valuable resource are the people whom he called ‘social entrepreneurs.’ People who decide in their hearts that they want to effect a certain kind of change and because of the quality of their motivation and their particular brew of talents they actually do go out and build organizations…Drayton’s insight was that if you want to cause system change, you have to move away from the mentality that we should support projects. Ultimately, the seed for all change is in the heart of a person. His goal was to create a selection system to find this kind of person early in their careers.¹⁰

Yet, charisma on its own will not necessarily succeed. Bill and his followers are crucial to the successful use of charismatic leadership, but so is an amicable crisis situation; in the case of Ashoka, the crisis involved a growing gap in productivity between the consumer sector and the social sector. We see a sense of real or imminent crisis in Bill’s time at the Environmental Protection Agency [EPA], where he uses contacts in the media to publicize harmful budget cuts and gain support for the EPA and at Ashoka, where social entrepreneurs are helped at their most critical moments.

As he conceived of it, Ashoka would be the most ‘highly leveraged’ approach to change possible, intervening at the ‘most critical moment in the life cycle’ of the ‘most critical ingredient in the development process’²

Bill also clearly articulates followers’ roles in managing crisis; for instance he put together a strong case to show that the [budget] cuts would effectively double Americans’ exposure to toxic pollutants by 1990 to aid journalists in writing sensational articles about the Reagan administration’s planned budget cuts for the EPA. At Ashoka, where the very vision of the organization is to empower individuals to solve societal problems, Drayton and his followers push potential fellows to formulate logical plans to affect change.

For Drayton, social change isn’t romantic. “It’s not a poem; it’s not like Xanadu,” he says. “There are many people who are creative and altruistic, but they are never going to change a pattern across a continent.” In other words, a vision of Xanadu is nice, but it won’t happen without a transportation plan and a sewerage system.¹¹

We also see the three tenets of transformational leadership in use at Ashoka, charisma and inspiration; intellectual stimulation; and individualized consideration. Bill’s charismatic leadership inspires followers, fellows, and supporters to believe in Ashoka’s goals and continuously seek to improve society, as shown by half of Ashoka itself containing social entrepreneurs. People seamlessly volunteer for projects as “…Drayton’s enthusiasm for a project has a way of sweeping up bystanders who question how they end up laboring in the eye of his storm.”¹¹The nature of the work Ashoka volunteers and staff perform requires constant use of emotional intelligence and analytical logic to decipher the probability of success when evaluating social entrepreneurial ideas and individuals.

In Ashoka each member of the selection panel interviews each candidate independently. Then Ashoka asks the “jury” to essentially decide whether they trust the person. As a test, they are told to close their eyes and imagine something they find fearful, like walking near the edge of a cliff or holding a snake, and then imagine that this person is with you. Do you find yourself feeling uneasy or relaxed? For many, the test provides a sense of whether you trust the person or not. Sometimes it works. Sometimes it doesn’t. It’s an appeal to the gut, not the intellect.¹⁰

Ashoka fellows and staff are also encouraged to find the hidden networks amongst the fellows that will allow all fellows to share in the collective wisdom of the Ashoka family and to pass on efficiencies gained in their own communities. For individual considerations, Ashoka reviews each potential fellow on an independent basis and provides unique support. For instance, rather than awarding a set stipend to each fellow, Ashoka matches the…social-sector salaries in each country, with some flexibility to accommodate fellows’ specific needs, such as if a fellow needed to hire a special care worker to look after a disabled child.¹

The class of 2003 at Ashoka’s School for Young Social Entrepreneurs in Poland.

Based on Bill’s role models, Mohandas Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr.,1 Thomas Jefferson, and Jean Monnet¹¹ [among others] it’s clear to see why and how Bill developed as a charismatic, transformational visionary. Just like Gandhi’s supreme belief in the need for change in India; MLK Jr.’s desire for equitable civil rights; Thomas Jefferson’s battle for a free nation; and Jean Monet’s vision of a united European economy, Bill’s aspirations of empowering social entrepreneurs with the funds, resources, and connections they need to enact their paradigm shifts shows his confidence that the time was right for social entrepreneurs and the need was real.⁷

Bill appreciates that Gandhi showed himself and the rest of the world that change comes faster and far more permanently by helping people understand when their behavior contradicts what an empathic response would dictate.⁹ Bill understood that utilizing the principles of free-market economics to make profit, while discouraging competition and innovation in the social sector led to great disparities in the ability of the social sector to help others, when compared to the commercial sector.

Bill showcases his self-awareness when admitting he is “…modestly an introvert, yet Bill also motivates himself to…spend most of my days dealing with people.”⁹, as he understands entrepreneurship relies on relationship building. Bill is willing to step outside of his comfort zone and interact with new individuals, a sign that Bill is a creative leader⁸. His kind descriptions of the individuals he interacts as “…wonderful, caring, creative entrepreneurs…” shows Bill’s exemplary leadership by “encouraging the heart”⁸ and his high-LPC side. However, Bill also has low-LPC side, as he enjoys accomplishing his goals, as shown through his fight to keep his improvements intact at the EPA.

Bill Drayton is able to promote Ashoka ideals among businesses, governments, non-profit organizations and communities by exerting his expert power; as Bill is the “social entrepreneur of social entrepreneurship”, he has verifiable proof that his ideas work.

Marmor went on to describe Drayton as a ‘wispy, carefully controlled, blue-suited fellow [who] has got enormous power. And connected to it is a shrewdness about the way institutions operate and the world really works.’²

The massive adoption of emissions trading as an effective method of reducing pollution also verifies his visionary ability in seeing and creating new ideas before they’re ready for the rest of society. For Ashoka staff, their ability to help social entrepreneurs cope with uncertainty by providing stipends to support themselves provides the staff with power to execute Ashoka’s vision and mission. The social entrepreneurs in turn hold centrality power⁸, as they are the achievers of Ashoka, without whom the vision and mission would crumble. These are the classic sources of power at Ashoka, but much more emphasis is placed on total empowerment.

Drayton declares that Ashoka:

…must be an integrated/decentralized organization that in every way enables and strongly encourages each of us to fly and yet that channels all that energy to serve the organization’s goals….Ashoka’s job and, indeed, our field’s most important job is to empower people. Our ultimate objective is everyone a changemaker.⁹

By empowering Ashoka fellows, socially entrepreneurial leaders are created who act as role models for other social entrepreneurs. Drayton truly believes that the power of Ashoka is in the ability to empower social entrepreneurs to not only pursue their goals, but to also gain experience and help other social entrepreneurs to change their own communities and societies. In this way, everyone across the world eventually becomes a social entrepreneur and is able to change their local surroundings to better match their needs, thus creating a world where each local community acts to improve itself, thus eliminating the need for large-scale organizations to pursue micro-philanthropy, which is pointed to by Ashoka’s critics as a negative aspect of Ashoka, when in fact it is the very aim of the organization and Bill Drayton’s dream.

The second bias that comes from focusing on individuals is a tendency to ignore the role of organizations and the resources they provide for pattern-breaking change. Researchers have long known that successful ideas require a mix of talents that is rarely found in one person. Indeed, the most compelling research on business entrepreneurship suggests that successful change requires a stream of capabilities including leadership, management, marketing, organizational design, and finance. Whereas philanthropists almost always focus on the individual, venture capitalists almost always focus on the leadership team and the organization to back it.¹²

Ashoka is empowering individuals and creating families of social entrepreneurs who help each other, rather than teams that defeat each other. Ashoka utilizes consensus building as a method of making decisions.

They generally have three to five people in a jury. After each candidate has gone through individual interviews with each juror, the panelists come together as a group. They score each factor on a three-point scale: one means excellent, two means ‘meets our standard,’ and three means ‘doesn’t meet our standard.’ They put their scores on a chart and have a discussion about it. The discussion is not just based on impressions, it’s based on the analysis. All decisions have to be unanimous. There is no voting. Generally speaking they are able to achieve consensus.¹⁰

This normative decision making style⁸ works at Ashoka because the leader, Drayton, has insufficient information on all the social entrepreneurs around the world and must rely on his followers to gather information. The followers of Ashoka also generally agree with the goals of the organization as shown by the majority of followers who are also social entrepreneurs. Bill’s “most important measure of organizational success is the proportion of my staff colleagues who have in fact entrepreneured something in the last year. We’re over 50 percent.”⁹ Though Ashoka focuses on empowering individuals, their true goal is to create enough communities of change-makers that other individuals will be inspired by them, much in the way Drayton was inspired by Ghandi. Once everyone understands their ability to create change, a giant global network is created, through which participative decision making can take place.

To empower social entrepreneurs, Ashoka relies heavily on the path-goal contingency theory⁸, which is basically a leadership model under which leaders remove obstacles so that workers can successfully accomplish their tasks. Adapting this theory to Ashoka, Bill and his colleagues find individuals working to improve an aspect of their community and assist them via financial support or entrepreneurial advice or connecting them with the right people to help achieve their goals.

The tasks Ashoka fellows attack are often unstructured, complex and novel, and Ashoka helps the fellows by repeatedly asking them logical questions derived from Bill’s favorite how to¹ questions, which poked at the holes in the social entrepreneurs’ plans and encouraged them to rationally think how to fix them. Bill picked up this tradition of asking how to from one of his role models, Ghandi. Though Ashoka did not directly provide instructions to the fellows, they did encourage the fellows to analyze the obstacles in their way and create procedures for removing them.

Though there are many reasons for the success of Ashoka and Bill Drayton, his belief in himself and his ideas allowed Bill to seize an opportunity and create an organization that empowers social entrepreneurs around the globe to improve their societies via business logic. Much like Bill’s vision of emissions trading took hold twenty years after the original idea, Ashoka’s vision of a world where individuals have the power and confidence to change their own communities and society at large is gaining ground quickly. Soon, hopefully, people will laugh at the thought of I’m just one person, I can’t change the world.

• Justin from LifeofJustin writes about a random adventure on the USC campus in Parking Lot Drinking at USC. Justin is spot on in describing USC as a movie-esque experience,
  

  What I concluded from this experience, is that I should of went to college at USC. The place is amazing and reminds you of all the movies you see that take place on college campuses.

Really makes me wonder why I transferred from USC…something about new experiences and getting out of the grime of downtown Los Angeles?

• Long time readers here know of my appreciation for the skills of Jay from Scribbles & Words but for you newbies, check out this great, quick tutorial from Jay about how to highlight text using only CSS.

Rather than a quote, here’s how a grey highlight looks.

• Random breaks occur on this blog as I tend to life first but I’ve learned to warn users, or at least put a quick message letting you know I’m still here. Jarko’s tips over at North x East gives a few reasons for taking a break from blogging and how to correctly do so. One of the tips is to save posts for a rainy day, which I already do (perhaps a bit too much with nearly 70 draft-posts). Jarko is right on about why to take a break when he states:
  

  …most importantly, the time away refuels your passion. After a few week’s break you are filled with new energy to pursue your goals with new determination and power.

  Each time I’m away from this blog tons of ideas come flowing to me that otherwise I don’t think of. Some of these ideas get implemented and some don’t but letting myself get away from a schedule and allowing my mind to wander certainly makes writing here much more enjoyable.

• All of us have a fight or flight instinct that controls many of our basic functions. This instinct derives from our ancestors having to quickly decide whether they could realistically succeed in a fight or if they should flee and fight another day. Marc from MarcandAngel discusses how to flee like a Bushido Samurai warrior.

There’s some great tips in Marc’s list, my favorite among them is:

Trust only those who have earned it. Be wary of those who have not.

Though it seems like common-sense, many of us throw our trust around to anyone and everyone within range. I tell this to people all the time, before you trust someone you should ask why you should trust them. Are they trying to sell you something or persuade you in some way? If so, most likely they should not be immediately trusted.

• Finally, Daniel from Daily Blog Tips wrote about Larry Page, one of Google’s founders, and Larry’s advice on how to change the world, a theme here this week. Daniel sums up Larry’s advice quite well:
  

  If you want to succeed on the web, you will need to let your fear of failure go away, and to try new and innovative things.

  Though Daniel frames it in terms of a web business, his advice applies to life in general. If you fear life, then sadly you’re already nearly dead. In the end, I’d rather die young but doing something I enjoy rather than dying of old age having successfully run away from anything that might be dangerous.

  I’m sure many of you have had similar thoughts but fear is a powerful emotion. Grasping that emotion and facing it head on is a thrill and can be used as energy to pursue any goal you have. Once you conquer your fears, they will go away and you’ll become more free.

  Related Posts:

  • Web Quotes and Counterpoints VI
  • Saturday Shout-outs: WQAC X
  • Web Quotes & Counterpoints XII
  • 3 From Every Tree: My Favorite Blog Project Entries
  • 3 Useful Del.icio.us Tags, Life Quotes, & Traffic Generators
  ]]> http://adamp.com/college/web-quotes-and-counterpoints-v/feed/ 6 http://adamp.com/college/the-final-two-an-update-to-my-final-four-picks/ http://adamp.com/college/the-final-two-an-update-to-my-final-four-picks/#comments Mon, 07 Apr 2008 20:42:45 +0000 Adam http://adamp.wp42.com/college/the-final-two-an-update-to-my-final-four-picks/ It’s time again for us to take a look back at my final four picks and see how they stack up now that we’re down to the last two teams. Last time we checked, 75% of my final four picks were still intact, with USC being the sole incorrect pick. Over the weekend, Kansas beat UNC and Memphis beat UCLA setting up a national championship of Kansas vs. Memphis.

  Since I picked UNC to beat USC in the national championship, my final four picks are officially kaput. Should be an interesting match-up and I’m glad to see Memphis in the big game instead of FUCLA. Since Kansas also knocked out my half-alma mater, UNC, I’m for sure rooting for Memphis.

  Related Posts:

  • Look Back at My Final Four Picks
  • My Final Four Picks
  • My 2009 Final Four Picks
  • Undergraduate Summer 2007 Grades – University of Massachusetts at Amherst
  • The Cash Train
  ]]> http://adamp.com/college/the-final-two-an-update-to-my-final-four-picks/feed/ 2 http://adamp.com/college/look-back-at-my-final-four-picks/ http://adamp.com/college/look-back-at-my-final-four-picks/#comments Mon, 31 Mar 2008 01:37:15 +0000 Adam http://adamp.wp42.com/college/look-back-at-my-final-four-picks/ Ten days ago I posted my picks for the teams to make it to the NCAA Final Four. Let’s take a look back at those picks and see how they worked out.

  My Final Four predictions:

  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC)
  • University of Southern California (USC)
  • University of Memphis
  • University of California – Los Angeles (UCLA)

  Then, in the Final Four UNC will beat Memphis and USC will beat UCLA.

  Well, turns out 75% of my Final Four is intact, while the other team I had pegged to make it this far (USC) lost its first game. Not bad overall considering I picked on the basis of having went to UNC and USC (and hating Dook and FUCLA and thus having them lose in the Elite Eight and Final Four, respectively).

  Go heels!

  Related Posts:

  • My Final Four Picks
  • The Final Two: An Update to My Final Four Picks
  • My 2009 Final Four Picks
  • Undergraduate Summer 2007 Grades – University of Massachusetts at Amherst
  • Top Five Schools I’ve Attended
  ]]> http://adamp.com/college/look-back-at-my-final-four-picks/feed/ 0 http://adamp.com/college/my-final-four-picks/ http://adamp.com/college/my-final-four-picks/#comments Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:10:06 +0000 Adam http://adamp.wp42.com/college/my-final-four-picks/ This post won’t have any insight or analysis, just my Final Four picks for the 2008 college basketball tournament.

  My Final Four predictions:

  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC)
  • University of Southern California (USC)
  • University of Memphis
  • University of California – Los Angeles (UCLA)

  Then, in the Final Four UNC will beat Memphis and USC will beat UCLA.

  Though I love my quarter alma mater, USC, my half alma mater, UNC, will go on to win the college basketball championship this year.

  Related Posts:

  • Look Back at My Final Four Picks
  • The Final Two: An Update to My Final Four Picks
  • My 2009 Final Four Picks
  • Top Five Schools I’ve Attended
  • Undergraduate Summer 2007 Grades – University of Massachusetts at Amherst
  ]]> http://adamp.com/college/my-final-four-picks/feed/ 0 http://adamp.com/college/im-back/ http://adamp.com/college/im-back/#comments Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:27:21 +0000 Adam http://adamp.wp42.com/college/im-back/ Hello there everyone! I’m just posting a quick note that I’m still here and will begin posting regularly again soon. To my RSS feed subscribers and anyone else who stumbles upon this page, I want to wish you all a belated Happy New Year! I didn’t intend to take this long of a break from posting but it felt good to not blog for the past couple of months and focus on other interests. A few days ago I began another graduate class at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst, Small Business Formulation and Development, which, so far, is very interesting and exciting. There’s a lot of events that happened in the past two months I want to discuss, from the Patriots great regular season to the recent political primaries and caucuses, so get excited for lots of new posts to come!

  Related Posts:

  • A Few Quick Notes
  • An Explanation To You
  • A Wicked Long Post about College
  • Quick Note to My Feed Readers
  • How I Quit Smoking In Less Than One Minute And You Can Too! Part 1
  ]]> http://adamp.com/college/im-back/feed/ 0