Comments on: A New Name for an Old Blog http://adamp.com/blog/a-new-name-for-an-old-blog/ Apple, Bicycles, Boston, Dot and Web Media Thu, 25 Feb 2010 03:28:28 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: rickyhttp://adamp.com/blog/a-new-name-for-an-old-blog/#comment-70679 ricky Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:47:17 +0000 http://adamp.com/?p=2697#comment-70679 The name is also important almost as the contest The name is also important almost as the contest

]]> By: LTO-2http://adamp.com/blog/a-new-name-for-an-old-blog/#comment-70680 LTO-2 Fri, 30 Oct 2009 07:55:55 +0000 http://adamp.com/?p=2697#comment-70680 Amm its ok Amm its ok

]]> By: peritonealmesotheliomahttp://adamp.com/blog/a-new-name-for-an-old-blog/#comment-70129 peritonealmesothelioma Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:13:03 +0000 http://adamp.com/?p=2697#comment-70129 Yes, thats true. the important thing is, the great content, not the name. Yes, thats true. the important thing is, the great content, not the name.

]]> By: Man Over Boardhttp://adamp.com/blog/a-new-name-for-an-old-blog/#comment-70078 Man Over Board Tue, 20 Oct 2009 03:34:13 +0000 http://adamp.com/?p=2697#comment-70078 If you feel you need to change it, then by all means good for you. To me it's not all about the name, but whats inside of the blog, meaning great content. Good luck :-) If you feel you need to change it, then by all means good for you. To me it's not all about the name, but whats inside of the blog, meaning great content. Good luck :-)

]]> By: Josh Ghttp://adamp.com/blog/a-new-name-for-an-old-blog/#comment-68054 Josh G Wed, 30 Sep 2009 22:22:08 +0000 http://adamp.com/?p=2697#comment-68054 I like it P. I like it P.

]]> By: Denver Engagement Photographerhttp://adamp.com/blog/a-new-name-for-an-old-blog/#comment-68033 Denver Engagement Photographer Wed, 30 Sep 2009 18:38:47 +0000 http://adamp.com/?p=2697#comment-68033 Sure why not.... only question is, besides this post, when I'm on this page I don't see the name anywhere? I have a feeling I just have my stoopid hat on, but if you're going to write a post about naming your blog, wouldn't it be prudent to have it be more visible? Sure why not…. only question is, besides this post, when I’m on this page I don’t see the name anywhere? I have a feeling I just have my stoopid hat on, but if you’re going to write a post about naming your blog, wouldn’t it be prudent to have it be more visible?

]]> By: Aprilhttp://adamp.com/blog/a-new-name-for-an-old-blog/#comment-67980 April Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:34:30 +0000 http://adamp.com/?p=2697#comment-67980 I agree.Also I really like the new name... but to be fair, i did really like prose of a pol. It was just so you. I agree.

Also I really like the new name… but to be fair, i did really like prose of a pol. It was just so you.

]]> By: Adam Pieniazekhttp://adamp.com/blog/a-new-name-for-an-old-blog/#comment-67635 Adam Pieniazek Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:18:36 +0000 http://adamp.com/?p=2697#comment-67635 I see what you're saying Ari, but I'm just not a fan of calling this site:Adam PieniazekI don't think domains have to necessarily be the site name, it helps with branding, but personally don't think it's an absolute.As for being something I'm not, well I am from Dot and Boston and proud of both affiliations and write about them here so IMO, it fits.Thanks for the feedback though, food for thought.P.S. Am inquiring about the dotboston.com domain. I see what you’re saying Ari, but I’m just not a fan of calling this site:

Adam Pieniazek

I don’t think domains have to necessarily be the site name, it helps with branding, but personally don’t think it’s an absolute.

As for being something I’m not, well I am from Dot and Boston and proud of both affiliations and write about them here so IMO, it fits.

Thanks for the feedback though, food for thought.

P.S. Am inquiring about the dotboston.com domain.

]]> By: Ari Herzoghttp://adamp.com/blog/a-new-name-for-an-old-blog/#comment-67631 Ari Herzog Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:06:22 +0000 http://adamp.com/?p=2697#comment-67631 I don't like it.Your domain is dot adampieniazek, not dot boston.Why try to be something you're not? I don’t like it.

Your domain is dot adampieniazek, not dot boston.

Why try to be something you’re not?

]]> By: Adam Pieniazekhttp://adamp.com/blog/a-new-name-for-an-old-blog/#comment-67624 Adam Pieniazek Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:25:31 +0000 http://adamp.com/?p=2697#comment-67624 Yes. :-) Yes. :-)

]]>